Some people think governments should care more about the elderly while others think they should focus on investing in education for younger people.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The population of a country irrespective of the age-group is an indispensable part of its growth and success. It is often claimed that the major part of the government's funds should be focused on the educational facilities for youngsters. On the contrary, a section of society argues stating that the needs of elderly people should be of a higher priority for the government. This essay will emphasize various points targeting each aspect before reaching to a more balanced and unbiased approach.
It is an irrefutable fact that the young population plays a pivotal role in improving the country's standards. Being the nation's backbone they act as an incredible investment resource who will return a hefty amount of interest in the form of economic status with a higher GDP rate. Moreover, despite reducing the unemployment issues, funded educational opportunities help in eradicating criminal activities as well. For example, an educated individual will not get exploited in the wrong hands.
However, while managing one sector of society, ignoring the other can be a huge failure and hindrance to the country's growth. Although aged people can not contribute directly to the development of a nation, the benefits from their invaluable experience and knowledge can not be overlooked. For instance, they can transfer their years of expertise with young people for a promising future. Hence, a good amount of money should be fixed towards the elderly pension plan, healthcare facilities, and mental health. As it is a common belief that a prosperous country has a healthy population.
To conclude, the views on whether to divert funds towards young minds in favor of elderly care varies largely. However, in my opinion, the government should distribute resources equally among both the sectors, as each sector defines the country's prosperity in its own unique way.
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 84
- The users of social media such as Facebook and Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 80
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up to the minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write a 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...oving the countrys standards. Being the nations backbone they act as an incredible inve...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...althcare facilities, and mental health. As it is a common belief that a prosperous...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29194630872 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91494868122 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7668067223 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228634458344 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661184075252 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568431641648 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130073629163 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454895516806 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.