SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD FOCUS ON REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND HOUSING PROBLEMS TO HELP PEOPLE PREVENT ILLNESS AND DISEASE. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE?
It is irrefutable that the development of economy leads to environmental issues and create pollution. Section of the society believe that authority should take a on who is creating pollution by which it do not negative effect on human health. This essay consent with above statement and the justification towards this will be analyzed in ensuing paragraphs.
To commence, there are numbers of the initiative measures should take by the government. The first and foremost one is that deforestation is major hurdles nowadays. Cut down of trees has been snowballing in the day to day basis by which people do not take proper oxygen. As a result, people become a victim of breathing and heart related issues. Deforestation is root-cause of climate change which is the important part of eco-system and human life. In addition to this, government should implement stringent rules and regulation on private vehicles. Authority should spread awareness regarding atmospheric changes and human being health on the public place. Recently, the Government of Delhi implement odd even rules on private car by which they get a success in prevent frog issue. It is very crucial for us and it is a big achievement for Delhi government.
Conversely, in the recent time poverty ratio is very high. Therefor, the government cut the ample amount of trees and construct new housing scheme by which they can reduce poverty ratio and give accommodation facilities for needy people.
In the final analysis, the reflection exhibited, leads to firmly assert that illness and disease have been increasing day by day and it can negative impact on peoples health. If the government will not act judiciously way than the future of society will look bleak in the years to come.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-01 | ketan | 61 | view |
2019-12-31 | Sukhwant Singh | 73 | view |
2018-11-28 | Maylyn Phan | 78 | view |
2018-11-02 | uniooo | 67 | view |
2018-09-24 | SN047 | 73 | view |
- The Internet is now used all around the world as a source of information and communication. However, it's often controversial, so many people think it needs to be controlled. Others believe there should be no interference whatsoever.Discuss both poin 84
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD FOCUS ON REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION AND HOUSING PROBLEMS TO HELP PEOPLE PREVENT ILLNESS AND DISEASE. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 61
- Some people say that E- books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magazines to what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
- Many people today especially in the developed world are choosing to have fewer children or none at all Why is this happening and do you think it is a good trend 64
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iety believe that authority should take a on who is creating pollution by which i...
^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...n who is creating pollution by which it do not negative effect on human health. Th...
^^
Line 9, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... can negative impact on peoples health. If the government will not act judiciously...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, look, regarding, so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12543554007 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84529283909 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5604605887 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9375 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150905477685 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410064200079 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326832640139 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782689083817 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204601253367 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.