Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are many different views about funding creative artists should be from governments or other sources. In my point of view, the government should have a financial support to such artists because of their contributions to public places in the country.
Many proponents believe that creative artists such as painters and musicians can earn enough money themselves and do not need the financial aid from the government. These gifted artist are professional and they are likely can secure an official job with a good salary as many other occupations. They might even can extra their income by selling their art work without any supporting policy from the government. For example, a painter who works for a designing company such as furniture design company can sell their individual pictures to their private customers for decorative purposes.
Apart from convinced reason mentioned above, I concur that the government should have some aids to artists because they contribute to the country in terms of attracting tourists and cultural diversity. Painters and musicians performing in the streets or public places make the cities become an interesting and attractive destination for visitors. For example, in Vietnam, there is a very famous street in Hanoi where vehicles are inhibited in the weekend for pedestrians to enjoy outdoor activities together, which are organized by themselves or artists. Foreign visitors are charmed by many public singing performances or being curious about Vietnamese traditional games organized inside the street.
In conclusion, although many advocate that artists can earn money and cover their living cost by themselves, I believe that they are deserved to the government support because of their intangible contribution to the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-23 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | killashaw | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | oyinmartha | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Friezzy | 84 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extend do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems What can individual people do 78
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
There are many different views about funding creative artists sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'many advocates'.
Suggestion: many advocates
...de the street. In conclusion, although many advocate that artists can earn money and cover t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45818181818 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81771491733 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.5341456949 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.454545455 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240292442998 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107091037886 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105294157437 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172366331653 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123175428535 0.056905535591 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.