Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country, while some people think it is bad. Discuss both views and static your opinion.
Many people believe that it would be beneficial for a country to host international sporting events, while some would think otherwise. This essay will shed light on both viewpoints as well as provide the writer's insights.
Advocates of the premise would argue that such events can do wonders for the tourism industry of the host country. Globetrotters would be inclined to choose the host country as their destination if there are fascinated by the competitiveness and fierceness from all the top-flight athletes. As a result, the country's image would get a significant boost, which is all the more important during this hard time of mankind. To follow that logic, Japan's reputation would be greatly benefited if her people could come through with their Olympic 2021's endeavors against the backdrop of this persistent pandemic.
That said, I side with the naysayers by arguing that the hosting decisions must be dictated by the seriousness and global influence of such events. A prime example for this argument is Sea Games-the multi-sport event for all countries in the South East Asia region. Its prestige is mediocre at best, thus the minimal effects on tourism and image's promotion. Consequently, events like these are nothing but a fiscal pitfall for the host country and an opportunity for corrupt politicians to enrich themselves and their cronies. This venality could be seen in Vietnam - the host of Sea Games 23 in 2005, the year when a plethora of general contractors were greenlighted with ease to build sports facilities for the aforementioned event. However, their building projects have been left derelict post - event, making this misure of taxpayers' money more flagrant as time progresses.
In conclusion, much deliberation should be taken when it comes to hosting international sporting events.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-20 | SanSan98 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-13 | trieu23012021 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mail features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 73
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Nowadays many families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both view and give your own opinion 56
- It is now possible foe scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole Do the advantages of this development of this development outweigh the disadvantages 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ssay will shed light on both viewpoints as well as provide the writers insights. Advocat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25517241379 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88030597455 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5660898267 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24046619701 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830607628171 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924045970234 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158637876938 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913506927166 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ssay will shed light on both viewpoints as well as provide the writers insights. Advocat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25517241379 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88030597455 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5660898267 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24046619701 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830607628171 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924045970234 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158637876938 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913506927166 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.