Nowadays, world is become a Global village, that means it is easy to travel for trading or for recreational purpose all around the world. Due to this, there is an ongoing debate regarding trade and cultural exchange all over the world, group of people think that it is beneficial for us, however, counter arguer claim that our individualities get vanished as a result of this. There are split opinions regarding the debatable argument. Prior to my opinion, both the aspects are analyzed further.
Highlighting, the first viewpoint, the most relevant argument that supporters put forward is that, trading with other nation will improve our economy. This is because, trading with other nation will increase our income and also increase our quality of product due to the international standards. Apart from this, we can use cutting edge technology to improve our production capacity. Because, due to huge demand of our product we can afford to use latest technology to improve our productivity. Most importantly, it will solve our one of the crucial problem of unemployment.
However, the latter view cannot be overlooked, to commence with, there a risk that people of county may forget their culture due to influence of other culture. By this, I mean that with the exchange of trade and business they also share their culture and it is possible that individual might forget about their own moral values. Besides this, crime rate will also like to increase. For example, foreign traveler will visit our countries and they think that they are soft target for the anti-social personalities and therefore crime rate will increase. To cap it all, our historical monument may get damage as more traveler visit them from across the globe.
In conclusion, despite individual having different viewpoint, I would clearly support the former view as it will strengthen our economy, as well as, give push to our tourist industries as a result employment also increase.
- in recent years, farming practice has changed to include methods such as factory farming and the use of technology to improve crops. Some people believe that these development are neccessary, which others regard them as ddangerous and advocate a return to 67
- Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem? 84
- Some people think that new technology is improving the lives of workers, other say it has more disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems 67
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do u agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ogy to improve our production capacity. Because, due to huge demand of our product we c...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'use the latest'.
Suggestion: use the latest
... demand of our product we can afford to use latest technology to improve our productivity....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 610, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'traveler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: traveler
...r historical monument may get damage as more traveler visit them from across the globe. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, for example, i mean, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72144083793 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6183023433 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.466666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110504253794 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397571357223 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316558340139 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667196200374 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284505042447 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.