Some people think that instead of preventing climate
change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, global warming has been receiving a great deal of media attention around the world due to its substantial impacts on
human life. Although the idea of coexistence between climate change and humans appears reasonable, it can not be viewed as the actual solution for humankind to combat climate change.
There are a number of reasons why the co-existence can do more harm than good.
First, climate change is mainly caused by humankind rather than nature itself. For example, the over-consumption of natural resources over the several decades has been affecting the ecology since most rely on carbon-rich fuels like coal, gas to produce the energy which is used to drive the world's economy that greatly contributing to global warming.
Second, the cost of co-existence is expensive, especially with developing countries, when the government doesn't seem to have enough money to invest in the special garbage disposal system.. For instance, Phu Quoc island which synonymous with breathtaking views, have been collected over 150 tons of garbage every day and the government can't find any actual solution to recycle it while Singapore, a developed country, invested 1.3 billion S$ for their special disposal system in Semakau island, the enormous amount of money that Vietnam's government can not afford.
It is more economically sound to actively prevent climate change than to ignore it.
In fact, it is easier for both the government and individuals to prevent climate change. Instead of investing a great deal of money in the disposal system, the government can use if for launching a big advertisement champion in school, social media and newspapers in order to raise awareness of citizens about recycling garbage, limiting plastic waste and nylons bags, especially the singer-use plastic products.
In addition, the cost of extinction is definitely more expensive. It should be noted that the extinction is irreversible and comes at great cost to the ecosystem and apparently humans living within it.
In conclusion, preventing global warming should be considered as the most actual solution in the status quo rather than adapting with it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-30 | Kamaljeet Singh | 92 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Amarul Azmi | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | MichaelP | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-21 | kissbiss | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-10 | hiva1998 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...e the energy which is used to drive the worlds economy that greatly contributing to gl...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...veloping countries, when the government doesnt seem to have enough money to invest in ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...t in the special garbage disposal system.. For instance, Phu Quoc island which syn...
^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...of garbage every day and the government cant find any actual solution to recycle it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, if, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31486880466 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81257257252 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583090379009 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.1550153775 49.4020404114 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.230769231 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.38176352705 205% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106291703795 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443172528255 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037436841918 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0491905637751 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333380247665 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.