Some people think that international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinions

Some people would argue that international car-free days can significantly reduce the level of air pollution while others believe there are other alternatives that are more effective. However, I personally believe that the combination of different approaches will yield more positive outcomes in the long run.

It is true that exhause fumes from cars are a major cause of air pollution as they contain a relatively high proportion of pollutants such as CO2. Thus, by having some days without cars on the road, no harmful smoke will be released into the atmosphere, and this will therefore better air quality. This policy is highly effective in major cities around the globe, such as Beijing, which is widely known for its atmosphere filled with smog. Since this car-free day policy has been introduced, the air quality of the city has been considered greatly improved by a vast majority.

However, there are certain important methods besides implementing the aforementioned initiative that can ameliorate the damaging effects of air pollution. Encouraging the use of public transport is one of these ways. Public transport, ranging from subways to buses, produce a smaller quantity of pollutants, which in turn is less likely to impact air quality. In addition to this, the disposal of waste, particularly plastic one emiting toxic fumes if burned, should be strictly regulated or monitored. The final and most effective way is to use sustainable and environmentally-friendly energy sources like solar or wind power, to replace fossil fuels in the long term.

In conclusion, although each method has its own merits in alleviating the air pollution issue, I strongly believe that a number of different methods can address the problem much more effectively.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30357142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02369680142 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7055682106 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225482723588 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700851489675 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0907148812136 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124725015068 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759071858849 0.056905535591 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.