In the course of time, environmental hot potatoes seem to be exacerbated by public's discontent with the substantial amount of fundings spent particularly on securing threatened species around the world. Accordingly, some would argue that this act is merely a costing and insignificant approach, while some reason that more fundings should be raised to protect those vulnerable species. From my perspective, it is necessary that more money be spent to put this act forward but in a more pragmatic and efficient way.
The importance of endangered species in general includes many functions related to ecology, medicine, algriculture, aesthetics and recreation. Take ecology funtion as an example, healthy ecosystem depends on animals and plants as it foundations, which means they provide a plethora of fundamental constituents such as fresh air and uncontaminated water for humans to make use of. With regard to medicine, over 50% of the 150 most prescribed medicines were originally derived from a plant or other natural product. This general reliance shows one importannt fact: we can by no means turn a blind eye to the potential extinction of susceptible creatures and refrain ourselves from being dependent on fundings, which seems to be the only feasible source we all can resort to.
To take it further, it is worth pointing out that our forthcoming gain appears to outweigh the initial investment if carried out productively. Although the raised money varies from countries to countries, even some have recently downsized it by a considerable number such as the USA as they consider this goal as unreachable, our plan will be much like building castles in the air without continuous fundraisings. As a matter of fact, our plans revolve around not only raising enough funds, then distributing them evenly between needed regions but also utilizing effectively that sum to the extent which more reserves are set up, more concentration and emphasis on environmental problems among people.
On the whole, endangered species are undoubtedly worth our protection and money. Rather than dwelling upon our regret over the money, it seems to more practical and sagacious to get down to by which way it can be implemented for the better to every region, and much larger, to our enormous world.
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from po 84
- Some people think that international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 50
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give yo 92
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a more pragmatic and efficient way. The importance of endangered species in ...
^^^
Line 3, column 761, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms to be the only feasible source we all can resort to. To take it further, it...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, then, well, while, even so, in general, such as, as a matter of fact, on the whole, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2472826087 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99457877966 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7950811945 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.916666667 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6666666667 20.7667163134 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230480984071 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869999115728 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766799780491 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141364219377 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816220152388 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.