The impacts of huge international companies are of great controversy. Some people claim that those corporations can be greatly beneficial to the economic growth of developing nations. Others, however, argue that the multinationals do more harm than good. In this essay, I aim to discuss both viewpoints and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, giant global firms play a role in promoting economic development in developing countries. With expanded infrastructure, it is much likely that the internationals will be in great need of employees, which leads to better income for regional residents. Take Turkey for example, its people gain 15% plus added to their current wages with global firms opening widely in the country. In addition, developing countries can be offered a variety of advanced products around the globe, therefore, adopt the equivalent technologies and manufacture process. That means when large corporations aim to invest more in skillful workers and top-notch facilities, developing nations can have healthier national economic prospects.
On the other hand, beneficial as it may seem, those large multinationals can pose a serious threat to the economic health of developing nations. To begin with, with more employees hired in those huge companies, local firms are more subjected to lose a great deal of income and workers, not to mention the shut-down due to lack of resources. It is the speedy development of international companies that ironically pushes regional corporations in developing nations to the margin of the industries, with Vietnam being a case in point. Second, owing to the successive cancellation of national shops mentioned above, there will be an inevitable disproportionate distribution in economic wealth across the country, causing state industry to depend heavily on foreign industries.
In conclusion, although large multinationals are somehow beneficial to developing nations, I believe that with the long term effects of these giants on the overall health of the nations, we are prone to be in hot water with various problems arising. However, these drawbacks can be substantially eradicated with the concerted effort made by the governments and the mass around the world.
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money 90
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from po 84
- Some people think that the internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are become more isolated Discuss both sides give your opinion 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... variety of advanced products around the globe, therefore, adopt the equivalent t...
^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ehow beneficial to developing nations, I believe that with the long term effects ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47536231884 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12865757389 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576811594203 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9563058762 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.933333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172703164393 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586033453679 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483117968443 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112238284434 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283165237994 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.