Given the fact that university fees are inexorably growing, the affordability of tertiary education has been a heated topic of controversy. Some people would argue the provision of free-of-charge education should be welcomed; however, I believe that the advantages brought about by the abolishment of tuition fees are far outweighed by its drawbacks.
On the one hand, waiving tuition fees can produce several positive outcomes. On the individual level, this policy can provide economically disadvantaged students with opportunities to pursue higher education, and this is particularly socially meaningful for those who possess a remarkable aptitude for academic studies but are financially at a disadvantage. On the societal level, the free-college policy would result in a more educated workforce. It comes as no surprise that without intellectually cultivated workers, scientific breakthroughs and technological advances would be out of reach to any country. Take Japan for example, that its robotics engineering has surpassed that of many industrialized countries can be attributable to its great emphasis on promoting education amongst its citizens, and this is verifiable to many Western nations as well.
On the other hand, the inititave to dispense with university tuition fees can have negative implications for both students and educational institutions in the long run. For one, an upsurge in the gross enrollment rate can incontrovertibly put a great deal of stress on numerous universities because they have to tax their existing learning facilities and human resources to accommodate the increasing influx of college attendees. Financial assistance from the government would become increasingly common, resulting in budget deficits, tax hikes, and reduced welfare. Furthermore, the abolition of tuition fees would render college qualifications inconsequential. This is because the acquisition of a tertiary degree has long been considered invaluable in giving a student an edge over other candidates; hence, a toughly competitive job market where even bachelor's degree holders constantly struggle to stand a chance of finding employment can spell disaster for university attendees.
In conclusion, the decision to get rid of university tuition fees would wreak havoc on the sustainability of educational institutions and the career prospects of students. Although some impoverished university attendees can benefit from this, I personally believe that it is preferable that students pay for their education, and to the financially disadvantaged, there ought to be optimal policies to encourage them to complete their studies as much as possible.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give yo 92
- Artists need a certain amount of freedom to develop their creativity Some people think that artists should have total freedom to express any thoughts and ideas To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money 90
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... but are financially at a disadvantage. On the societal level, the free-college po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2394.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78260869565 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36394263639 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 506.74238477 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.5288196155 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.0 106.682146367 160% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183282460857 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620666285938 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416919195262 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114487084467 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259304306442 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 16.66 50.2224549098 33% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.84 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 78.4519038076 181% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.