It has been thought that having an official international language may facilitate many barriers casting a shadow over global transactions today like communicative and economic expansion between nations. As opposed by some who regard this as threat to cultural diversity which in long run leads to unified culture and loss of one’s identity. I’m of the opinion that the benefits of having a common language whether official or unofficial outweigh its drawbacks especially in time of rapid globalization. I will assert my opinion regarding the matter shortly.
The pivotal role of an international language cannot be ignored since it paves the way to many problems that the world may encounter as political, economic, and others of that like. It impedes misunderstanding that may result in breaking down the business or negotiations between the two nations. In addition, It is not only enable businessmen to communicate more efficiently but also flourish the business. Not to mention that People from different parts of the world travel all over the world with less trouble in understanding one another. They will be introduced to tourist attractions and given better outlook or perspective about the country’s culture and traditions by the locals speaking with that language. Finally, people living in a nation with multi languages will find communication much easier if they have an official international language.
On the other hand, it has been proven that language shapes the way we think meaning every language brings with it a new identity and culture. This makes the official language superior to locals’ and those who speak with it regarded upper class and educated citizens. As we have seen in Iran, Kurdish & Turkish languages, for example, are considered subordinate in compare to Farsi which is a dominant language here. The same is true for nations which have English as their official language. The sweeping trend of globalization has intensified this change, trying to make the world a unified place where people wear the same clothes, watch the same movie, speak the same language and so forth. It will also devastate tourist industry as people no longer find visiting other countries an exotic place to travel hundred miles away from their home country.
To sum up, having a universal language is advantageous. It is not only make it possible for people to have rapid access to technology and all the knowledge of the world though internet, but also communicate easily whenever they are on business trip. The disadvantages will be sunk without the slightest issue heading for cultural heritage of one’s nation if it is used for special purposes like commerce and native language for everyday language and instruction.
- some people think women should be allowed to join the army, the navy and the air force just like men. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution, others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Families who do not send their children to government-financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that support universal education.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Some people think that it is important to have a single language as an international official language Others think that it will make it difficult to identify countries and cause a loss of culture Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and their employees to the countryside.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, may, regarding, so, for example, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2323.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 441.0 315.596192385 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26757369615 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90344488834 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.292996784 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.263157895 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262074362793 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775775871192 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495275680241 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154384824682 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375100657232 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.