Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Anyone can learn many various skills from sports in their life. Some say that sports require many players is beneficial, while others feel that individual is the best. This essay will look at both views and explain why I think playing in a team is superior in this category.
Many people believe that individual sports games are more advantageous because they can provide many useful skills such as risk-taking abilities, independence, and many more. When a person plays tennis or table tennis, resulting in they have to take risks and try all possible ways by own self to win a game, they become more independent in life. For instance, a survey showed that people who played chess during their academic years performed hard calculations and done all work faster than others. Hence, playing individual games make people more fearless and self-dependent.
On the other hand, people become more sociable and confident while playing a game in teams. They communicate with others in a group on daily basis. This may lead to a person to be more confident, while he speck to the public, he can share his problems as well as opinions. For example, Virat Kohli, a cricketer, did not know English, but after playing cricket for donkey's years with his teammates, he fluently speaks without making any pauses between his speech. So, these types of evidence prove that although people have to depend on someone in a team, it provides many benefits.
In conclusion, both individual and team-related sports bring many useful things for human beings from individualism to confidence. In my words, despite having a part of a team, people gave to depend on others, it provides more advantages, which are far better and more than individual ones provide.
- The pie charts below show the devices people in the 18 to 25 age group use to watch television in Canada in two different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Today the life expectancy of people is much higher than before Some people think that older people should continue to be involved in the workforces To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some cites have few controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings People think that they should be free to choose the design they like Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away Causes and problems 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'specks'.
Suggestion: specks
...a person to be more confident, while he speck to the public, he can share his problem...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00687285223 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60814555035 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621993127148 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5466298149 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301083814208 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999291091634 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557775126615 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180386706912 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441049329321 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.