It is believed by many that the best way to be educated about foreign countries is to travel there, whereas others think that it is not a must and you can get to know enough from digital resources, such as the internet and television. This essay agrees that exploring a country physically is a vital part of getting detailed insights.
On the one side, digital advancement and cutting-edge technology have made it easier and convenient to explore information about any part of the world. With few clicks and a suitable device, can get the person any desired information about the culture, history, traditions, inhabitants and economy. It is way less time consuming and affordable because not everyone can easily bear the cost of travelling and this mode has brought a big advantage to interested people with limited resources. For example, a person from the developing world can learn almost anything about the United States by being online at any time of the day around the year. Therefore, contemporary technology has reduced the need for travel to explore any part of the world by providing virtual resources.
On the other side, however, several things cannot be explored or witnessed via the use of technology and can only be done by travelling. The feel of the weather and the taste of the food are few of those things that only a traveler witnesses upon arriving at another country. In addition to that, being physically somewhere allows the explorer to get to know the local people better during an interaction. Whereas media limits this and sometimes only shows what interests the viewers most, regardless of the reality. For example, many people across the world have a poor opinion about Pakistan, whereas many foreign tourists experienced the real country and promoted in their social media pages and confessed that how skeptical they were before their visit, but the opinion changed.
In conclusion, although the digital media has advanced to an extent that it can give the explorers a feel about the foreign places, it has its limitations, and due to that, it cannot be replaced with the experience of physical travel. In my opinion, it is mandatory to go in-person to a place, if someone wishes to get a real experience of everything.
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 61
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 67
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 89
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet Discuss both views and give your own opi 84
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him. You have found another friend who can go instead of you. Write a letter to your friend. In your letterExplain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead of youSay wh 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96569920844 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70788768565 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538258575198 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.4826809529 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.428571429 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0714285714 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194054132303 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637622132152 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486551163226 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117024932413 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236507994042 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.