Presently, several young learners exit from educational institutions with negative sentiments towards the learning process. The primary cause of this development is the outdated and boring education system, and a solution to this is to include the contemporary learning methods and technology to make the educational journey more interesting.
Considering the education system in the context of developing countries, it can be seen and observed that the syllabus and the methods are progressing way slower than they must be. Most of these ways are traditional and outdated, whereas with technological advancement and exposure of pupils to it have elevated their interests and expectations towards schools. A typical way of drowning the young knowledge seekers with the bundle of home work and hours of study after official time is no longer applicable. For example, in 2018 a research published in Dawn News shows that on average a child of grade five in Pakistan spends two hours to complete the homework daily. In other words, the amount of time an adolescent used to spend while playing has been taken away by the school.
To tackle this problem, it is of extreme importance that the educationist must immediately develop robust educational programs. The idea is that the workload must be minimized for these early learners by establishing the interesting modes of studies, such as adding the concept of gamification into the learning process. The number of home assignments should be reduced and made interesting and appealing so that the students feel entertained rather bored and passive. It can also be observed that most homework students get at the early stages is very theoretical, and that must be reduced and replaced with the experimentation.
In conclusion, undoubtedly, an improvement in the overall academic setup by adding advanced methods will minimize the pressure on the school going scholars, and consequently, they will leave the institutes with the positive feelings and gentle remarks.
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him. You have found another friend who can go instead of you. Write a letter to your friend. In your letterExplain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead of youSay wh 87
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet Discuss both views and give your own opi 84
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 67
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However,other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3690851735 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00694297541 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589905362776 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1665780141 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.833333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4166666667 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190855761862 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628913378544 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441115360163 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108902081608 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195979292969 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.