It is believed by many that containing wild animals in a controlled environment for the public display must be shut down, as animals get brutal treatment in such places, whereas those of the opposing view holds the argument that these places are of great help in protecting endangered species. This essay agrees that the wildlife must be protected by other means rather than being caged in the unnatural habitat.
On the one side, an increasing number of species are being added to the extinction list continuously. Whereas, the zoo serves as a platform to ensure the continuity of such animal’s breed in a very controlled way, by providing all the necessary arrangements. These places are multipurpose, one is that the animals are being saved from the poachers and the detrimental effects of climate change and habitat destruction by the urbanization. In addition to that, they provide entertainment to young visitors for fun and adults for research purposes. For example, undoubtedly, all the children love to see and interact with animals in their childhood and this can only happen with the presence of zoos.
On the other side, the claim and concern of the people who argue that these places mistreat animals and must be closed shall be addressed with seriousness. All living beings have the requirement of a certain suitable environment to live and prosper. It is of extreme importance to understand that caging any living being is unjustifiable and it does not match with the natural way of living. If they must be preserved, there should be other ways such as wildlife parks, where they can roam around freely without any compulsion. This freedom is not being provided by most of the controlled facilities presently. For instance, a study published in 2018 in Dawn news showed that 80% of the local zoos in Pakistan serve less food than the actual requirement of the contained wildlife and that resulted in deaths of 10% of the population in the last five years.
In conclusion, although, many support the idea that controlled facilities benefit wildlife by avoiding them from extinction, however, to match the natural habitat need and to avoid any mistreatment of these poor creatures’ other options must be considered such as dedicating an open area free from external compulsion.
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and all the zoos should be closed. However,other people think that zoos are useful to protect the rare animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- These days many young people leave school with negative attitude towards learning. Why is this happening? What can be done to help young people to leave school with more positive attitude towards learning. 78
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet Discuss both views and give your own opi 84
- Many people think that important things in life are mostly free or can’t be bought. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your opinion and examples from your own experience. 61
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him. You have found another friend who can go instead of you. Write a letter to your friend. In your letterExplain why you cannot go anymoreSay who can go instead of youSay wh 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only happen with the presence of zoos. On the other side, the claim and concern...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10026385224 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87491204917 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551451187335 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4271428429 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.071428571 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0714285714 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119693104974 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421768418994 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0248413182615 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695847423778 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312850644666 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.