Some people think it is one of the best ways to solve environmental problems by increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think it is one of the best ways to solve environmental problems by increasing the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is asserted that environmental issues could be addressed once the price of petrol rises. Personally, I completely disagree with this ostensible notion for the fact that car fuel is merely one of the various factors that heavily impact the environment and there will be continuing demand for that source of energy from people.
For one thing, the rapid pace of industrialization negatively affects the environment in many aspects. Admittedly, vehicle’s gas emissions contribute largely to it, however, industrial plants also release tons of noxious fumes into the atmosphere daily. Factories do not function based on petrol but act as an existential threat to the ozone layer. In the meantime, increasing petrol cost generally surmount a minor aspect among the numerous, and importantly, it will take a heavy toll on people’s lives. This is indisputably not a feasible solution, compared to the overall situation as it benefits a select one over the majority, which is ineffective and environmental degradation will perpetuate negatively.
For another, as the demand for petrol is inelastic, its consumption does not vary significantly according to the fluctuation of its price. Commuting purposes rely heavily on fuel-based vehicles and even if there is a radical change in the fuel costs, the public will continue to accept it as transportation has been an indispensable part of their lives. Additionally, since fuels represent an increasing proportion of household expenditure, many people acknowledge the importance of reducing non-essential trips before the rise of petrol price. Hybrid and fuel-efficient cars have been implemented in order to curb the fuel consumption as much as possible. Hence, it depends upon individuals’ attitudes towards the environment, rather than external factors affecting petrol costs.
To conclude, the option to increase petrol price is not a viable solution to address environmental problems. Attention must be drawn on raising public awareness about the poor state of the environment to surmount the issues in the long run.
- More and more people are choosing to eat healthy food and making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can we do to encourage this 89
- Globalization is positive for economies but its negative sides should not be ignored To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country Others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always good Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19222628052 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9973436794 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380375908161 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119527857493 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16881735212 0.0667982634062 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269881470152 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.323788934088 0.056905535591 569% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for one thing
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43181818182 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19222628052 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605113636364 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9973436794 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380375908161 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119527857493 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16881735212 0.0667982634062 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269881470152 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.323788934088 0.056905535591 569% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.