Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the world cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is disputed that whether money is squanderred to hold huge sport competitions, or the events have positive implications on the host nation. This essay will elaborate on both sides of the argument, and explain why the gains would overshadow the disadvantages.
On the one hand, it is beneficial for the country organizing the events in many dimensions. Large sport festivals open up opportunities for nations to promote their national images to the world. The major undertaking not only renders the host regconizable to the rest of the planet, but fosters their soft power which facilitates their economic, cultural, social cooperations globally. Another advantage of holding international sporting events is that it spurs national sports development. Appearance of renowned athletes such as Messi, Ussan Bolt in would lure milions of audience to sport competitions, who can be potential buyers of a plethora of offerings. The beneficiaries including manufacturers, retailers and media moguls, those entities therefore may allot billion dollars to sponsor for the major events which in turn can be diverted to further progression of sports in general.
On the other hand, there are dark sides of organizing major sport events. The first issue is that the host nation has to bear prodigous expense including new constructions, and refurbishment of available facilities and infrastructures. Despite the huge allocation of resources in advance, it is uncertain that the authorities are able to reap the benefits from the economic bet. It is not uncommon that the colossal cost of holding such events leaves nations mired down in debt afterwards. Additionally, the influx of foreign visitors may disturb the rhythem of local everyday life. Anomalous beliefs, exotic culture, and unfamiliar lifestyle coming along with the outsiders may appear foreign to the native, placing the foreigners at odds with local citizens. This acts as a predecessor for unwanted hostility between local and overseas spectators.
In sum, the outcome of spending money on sport events is unclear and the events would disrupt the ambiance. However, the organizers are given great chance to build up reputation and encourage domestic sports advancement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Nguyễn Tiến Vũ | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | linhchihwg | 82 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think technology development decreases crime while others believe it actually encourages crimes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain young people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...uls, those entities therefore may allot billion dollars to sponsor for the major events...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, in general, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48115942029 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04899982223 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602898550725 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3709692106 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.235294118 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.29411764706 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265004957357 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796840890902 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720237608735 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162392037504 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517465953466 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.