Undoubtedly, the influx of people to big cities is caused by the greater job opportunities. Given that the headquarters of a lot of entities are located in cities, some feel that to tackle the problems related to this, governments should encourage large firms and the whole industrial sector to relocate in the countryside. In this essay I will explain why I believe that the benefits of such a decision do not outweigh the disadvantages.
Supporters of the movement of companies to the rural areas state that this would be an effective solution to problems like traffic and pollution. Indeed, traffic congestion and environmental problems including air pollution are reconciled with the establishment of industries in major cities. New York City, for instance, is known for the congested city center due to the extended use of cars; people there choose to commute by car, and most of the time they are occupied in the branches of large corporations in this city. This means that a sheer amount of greenhouse gasses is emitted in the atmosphere provoking air pollution, and thus environmental issues to the cities. If authorities convinced the companies and industries which significantly pollute the air to move to the outskirts of cities or to the regions of the countries, gas emissions would be decreased, and environment would be improved.
Even though the mitigation of pollution has merit, there are many who feel that the relocation of big firms in the countryside would not result in positive impact for the environment. If large companies decided to move to the rural areas, there would be need for a massive construction of buildings to host them. In other words, the rural scene would be extremely different compared to the present, while trees and parks would be eliminated in order to give space to the new buildings. In Greece, for example, when an industrial plant of a big company moved to a regional area, the nearby village polluted and changed to a horizontal city because of the deforestation. Obviously, if large companies migrated to the rural areas, there would be inimical effects on the environment.
In conclusion, although some people argue that the entities and industry should be relocated away from the urban areas, there are many who advocate the opposite. I am of the view that the upsides of such movement far outweigh the downsides related to the construction of new establishments in green areas.
- the map below show the village of stokeford in1930 and 2010 summarise the information and make comparison where relevant 79
- In order to be successful in sport some people think you have to be physically strong Others say that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 73
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 73
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things What is your opinion 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06451612903 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98367879573 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511166253102 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4703818364 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.066666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303541061981 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968738053876 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627948071405 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167107960827 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576262237708 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06451612903 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98367879573 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511166253102 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.4703818364 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.066666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8666666667 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303541061981 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968738053876 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627948071405 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167107960827 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576262237708 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.