Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Prohibiting mobile phone in some public location like libraries, shops or public transport nowadays is encouraged by many individuals. From my perspective, apart from some certain areas which are prone to auditory interference, there are still some locations that mobile phone is not really a concern. Thus, I partly agree with this statement
On the one hand, mobile phone is often the main reason for botheration in some certain locations that highly valued tranquility. Specifically, many public areas are utilized because of their high level of quietness that can be helpful for intellectual activities, therfore, due to its destructive nature, mobile phone can deteriorate these atmosphere. For instance, many students come to library because of its specific design which can ultimate the one’s concentration and productivity. As mobile phone can create a gigantic auditory inteference, they should never be used in such places
On the other hand, there are other places that mobile phones are still really essential. In detail, smart phone is not only a tool for communication but also really helpful in many other activities. For example, finding the shortest route while traveling on public transport is an ordinary activity of human that require mobile phone. Therefore, smartphone can not be totally banned in every public locations because of different level of tranquility each public places demand and also the significant impact of it in society nowadays
To conclude, although this is still a controversial topic that many individuals still advocate to completely ban the utilization of mobile phone in public areas. I endore my partial agreement, that is not necessary to ban mobile phone in all public locations since while there are some places prefer quiet environment, it is an compulsory part to use mobile phone in others
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 73
- punished 67
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 84
- The charts compare the proportion of energy produced by different sources in France in 1995 and 2005 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this atmosphere' or 'these atmospheres'?
Suggestion: this atmosphere; these atmospheres
...ve nature, mobile phone can deteriorate these atmosphere. For instance, many students come to l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere. For instance, many students come to library because of its specific design w...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey should never be used in such places On the other hand, there are other place...
^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... places prefer quiet environment, it is an compulsory part to use mobile phone in ...
^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lsory part to use mobile phone in others
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, really, so, still, therefore, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38144329897 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8948744055 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54295532646 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.1103465481 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.6 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343163393918 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146860245104 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846748448306 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224685659468 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259317167597 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.52 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.