It is suggested that architecture in the same neighborhood should follow the traditional style to ensure uniqueness. However, i personally believe that such an idea seems impractical in the modern world, and that architecture freedom should be given to households.
Some people believe that the homogeneity of exterior design of houses could add a touch of beauty and uniqueness to the local area. Several old towns in the world have gained in popularity for their distinctive landscape of traditional houses against the back-drop of modern cities. Hoi An ancient town in Vietnam could exemplify this point as new houses in the town are constructed with yellow walls and a brown roof to blend with their surroundings. Although such an attempt is acclaimed for its contributions to the preservations of traditions and old architectures, i believe this is not a viable practice to be applied everyday. Since traditional houses are usually one-story tall with small rooms and narrow doors, they may be inappropriate for extended families and the different demands of households.
As opposed to the impracticality of such an idea, there are strong grounds for allowing people the freedom to design their houses as they wish. Compelling people to comply with one architectural style could, in some cases, be even unfeasible and even go against their freedom of choice. Besides that, only when people are allowed to design and decorate their houses to best meet their needs, do houses fulfill the real purpose of their existence as comfortable shelters for families. This is particularly the case for people who have a huge passion for having a distinctively designed or even bizzare- looking home as long as these houses make them happy.
In conclusion, i am firmly of the view that conforming to one traditional architecture is not a working idea in the modern world in which people's right to have their own home custom- designed to cater for their needs and preferences is protected by laws.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- It is quite common for both parents in a family to work. Sometimes it is because they need two salaries to survive whereas other times it their choice.What problems do you see in this situation? How does this affect the children and family life? 56
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.Discuss both these views and give yo 73
- Some people think that governments must insist on preserving traditional appearance of old buildings undergoing renovation or redevelopment. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? 56
- Some people believe that bicycles are the best mode of transport in the cities while others disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both views and give your opinion 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 571, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ns of traditions and old architectures, i believe this is not a viable practice t...
^
Line 2, column 625, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... is not a viable practice to be applied everyday. Since traditional houses are usually o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ouses make them happy. In conclusion, i am firmly of the view that conforming t...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, may, so, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11042944785 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95115619632 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.6398133174 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.833333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278724872427 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10968310791 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556049102412 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155527992774 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676432187292 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.