Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old house in the local areas, while other think that people should have freedom to build house of their own styles. discuss both views and give your opinion.
style="font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times new Roman", serif;">it is argued that modern counterparts should be compatible with traditional accommodations in the locality, whereas others think that people have the right autonomy in choosing their own style. I agree with the view that people should build the house goes with the identical local areas
style="font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times new Roman", serif;">On the one hand, there are strong arguments that new housing should follow the traditional style in the particular locality. In terms of the cultural values, conventional counterparts remain the beauty of cultural identity which become a tourist destination in the country and generally over the world, which reduce the unemployment rate in the region. Take a hue province as an example, one of the most ancient city in Viet Nam, the authorities encourage local people to preserve the antique house or construct new house in ancient style, combine with custom cultures, which made hue is regarded as one of the most tourist destinations, at the same time the living standard of inhabitants have been overcoming.
style="font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times new Roman", serif;">On the other hand, it is believed that people should have personal choice of their house style. Firstly, by being freedom to show the owner characteristic, which make their homes are distinctive comparison to surrounding others. In terms of construction costs, materials of modern counterparts are more reasonable than its convention due to it is easily obtained and produced, like iron, steel. whereas, building traditional home made from woods which is hard to find and affect natural resources.
style="font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times new Roman", serif;">In conclusion, although both of them have many benefit, I completely agree that new housing in harmony with cultural identity in the locality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
- The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region. 73
- : Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main resources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think it is positive or negative developement. 89
- the graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufactures to produce vehicles 78
- two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 84
- Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Style
style='font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Style
...oes with the identical local areas style='font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Style
... inhabitants have been overcoming. style='font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 502, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...btained and produced, like iron, steel. whereas, building traditional home made from wo...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Style
...find and affect natural resources. style='font-size: 14pt; line-height: 107...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 149, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun benefit seems to be countable; consider using: 'many benefits'.
Suggestion: many benefits
... conclusion, although both of them have many benefit, I completely agree that new housing in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.04745762712 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.84617166593 2.80592935109 137% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549152542373 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8064827187 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 198.222222222 106.682146367 186% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7777777778 20.7667163134 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205149193351 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881639219529 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735724630132 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153263977279 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664376354059 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 13.0946893788 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.4 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 24.0 9.78957915832 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 24.0 10.7795591182 223% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.