Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of old houses in local areas. Others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own style.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
There are opposing views regarding how new houses are constructed. While some believe that these buildings should conform to the style set by old houses in the area, others show advocacy towards owners’ freedom of choice. Both views, along with my opinion, will be elaborated on in the following essay.
On one hand, there are sound reasons why new houses should adhere to the style established by older buildings. Forefront among these is that the same architectural style can give an aesthetic appeal and cultural value to an area. This could be seen in the case of the old quarter in Hanoi. As this two-storey housing compound gains widespread recognition for its nostalgic charm, it would be strange to have a towering office building erected in the middle of the area. Furthermore, if houses share the same style, they may incubate a sense of solidarity and uniformity among residents. The most frequently cited reason is that accommodation is perceived as a status symbol; thus, having similar houses makes people more relatable in the eye of their neighbors.
On the other hand, other people contend that homeowners should get to build houses according to their own preferences. The strongest argument for this view is that people have the rights to express themselves, even in their choice of housing style. Ultimately, a house is only worth living if the owner is content with it. Moreover, old houses are notorious for failing to adhere to safety requirements. There is an increasing weight of evidence supporting the notion of old houses being more susceptible to risks of fire or internal structural damage, which makes it ill-advised to follow their style of construction.
Taking into consideration both sets of arguments, I agree that people are entitled to build houses of their own style, but they should, nonetheless, contemplate the overall style of the area and more importantly, ensure safety requirements are met.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-25 | Phạm Phú Trường | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-22 | Invisible | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | n0air9x9 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | n0air9x9 | 89 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- Some think that ambition is a good quality Is it important to be ambitious Is it a positive or negative characteristic 61
- Information technology has changed our lives in many ways and dominates our homes leisure and work activities Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks 84
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Information technology has changed our lives in many ways and dominates our homes leisure and work activities Do the benefits outweigh the drawbacks 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., there are sound reasons why new houses should adhere to the style established b...
^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uments, I agree that people are entitled to build houses of their own style, but ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15772870662 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82055975379 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5193136013 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475894148841 0.244688304435 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150216346592 0.084324248473 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870667777911 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302853128342 0.151304729494 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501464448988 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.