Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this day and age, people have had deeper insights and given equal important to both physical and mental state of mind, especially in terms of sport fields. While some claim that only physical strength is salient whereas detractors share an idea that intellectual strength is higher. In my opinion, both of above aspects, play an imperative role. In this essay, I will discuss on both sides of the matter.
To begin with, (on the one hand) it is a well-established fact that an athlete is required to ensure physically fit in order to reach success and stay on top of a competition. If they lack of energy, it is likely that they can become a redundant member in their own match. To illustrate this point, a football player must be able to remain sustainable physically strength to withstand a long-lasting game up to 90 minutes, excluding additional spans. Therefore, to become champion of a sport event, players should make every effort to enhance the capacity of tremendous stamina which is considers as one of primary factors helping an athlete succeed.
On the other hand, a strong mental attitude makes an important contribution to deciding whether or not a player become champion. If trainers cannot foster a competitive spirit or even a win at-all-costs attitude, players may be lack of motivation and ambition to work hard and succeed. Moreover, it is extremely vital to anticipate and have deeper insights into the movement of their own opponents. For example, in a game of chess, the sportsman/woman need maintain sustainable conscious and flexible state to recognize a rival’s trap. It is true that apart from physically strong, it is important to also think on one’s feet how to tackle their opponent.
In conclusion, in my own perspective, being physically and mentally strong is pivotal for the success of a player or a team.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | Shinycorn122 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | mike123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Đặng Quỳnh Như | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- The graphs below show the cinema attendants in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The use of mobile phone should be banned in public places like libraries and shops To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000 84
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age group used to get daily news in one country in 2011 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...s an important contribution to deciding whether or not a player become champion. If trainers c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for the success of a player or a team.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95498392283 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9312310496 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585209003215 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4275362183 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254706803842 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735107561017 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063702406944 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144468738637 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.08570844969 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.