Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think that it is causing the opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is believed that the ubiquity of eclectic technological advancements has been widening the wealth inequality, while others reckon the opposite is true. Although this equipment confers pronounced merits on bridging this gap, the reserve is at a higher level.
On the one hand, technologies afford people the scope to access a rich diversity of free-of-charge knowledge and information. These days, credible e-learning platforms such as Udemy, Khan Academic, Skillshare, among others, which are the reservoir of all-facet insights, enable students with financial hardship to enrich their educational background without worrying about tuition fees, thereby standing a chance of landing a decent job in the future. In addition, technological advance empowers the disadvantaged to lift out of poverty. For instance, Facebook has given myriad people opportunities to start their own business at a minimal cost, and the ride-hailing networks such as Grab, GoViet, Be Group generate a substantial decline in the jobless.
On the other hand, it is understandable why some people believe that technologies are the causative factors in social inequality. In fact, the main focus of state-of-the-art devices is merely the affluent individuals. In terms of the medical domain, for example, whilst a great number of advanced therapies for lethal illnesses can save thousands of lives, the exorbitant expenditure of these meditations is still out of reach for the have-nots, thus these privileges are only confined to the haves. If low-income ones want to approach these remedies, they will bear a heavy financial burden, which even exacerbates their socio-economic status quo. Moreover, as the application of automated machines pervades most manufacturers, it poses a threat to human job losses, as evidenced by how innumerous manufacturing jobs are eliminated by automation. According to recent estimations, 47% of unskilled jobs in the US are likely to be supplanted by computers over the next ten years. This problem is compounded by the fact that this trend is no longer a monopoly in developed countries, it is now also jeopardizing the job security of blue-collar workers who will be replaced by the automatic process in myriad industries in developing ones. These repercussions bear testimony to how detrimental effects exerted on income disparity.
In conclusion, technological innovations are the game changer in human society however, it behooves the public to favorably capitalize on them as a bid for a better world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-16 | princeeeee | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | long1964 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | Sanaullah97 | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | Elaineletere | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-06 | trungpham96 | 64 | view |
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance to what extent do yo 89
- Some people think that the range of technology currently available is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people Others think that it is causing the opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance to what extent do yo 84
- As earth runs out of natural resources we have started to look to space for solutions However some people argue that this is the wrong thing to do and instead we should look for alternative solutions here on earth 89
- Some educationalists argue that non exam arts based subjects such as music drama art and craft should be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance to what extent do yo 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
.... On the one hand, technologies afford people the scope to access a rich diversity of...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...tors in social inequality. In fact, the main focus of state-of-the-art devices is merely t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 388.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50257731959 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24151299126 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644329896907 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8068396618 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8666666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53333333333 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105083928467 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377011729415 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546262252603 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584161232628 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259232110525 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 78.4519038076 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.