Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that people have different views about which type of students should be rewarded by schools. While many people believe that only students who have good academic results deserve to be honored with rewards, I also argue that all students who show their efforts in their studies should have equal chances to be rewarded.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why schools need to reward students who show outstanding academic performance. Firstly, doing so could create a highly competitive studying environment in which students would feel more motivated to try hard to get a higher score. For example, many schools have monthly final tests to examine their students’ academic ability and give presents to students who have the best results. The implication of this is that students would have more encouragement to apply themselves in their studies. Secondly, through selecting and rewarding top students, teachers could easily find excellent students and have special training for them. This would help these students to nurture and develop their academic skills and they could take many contests on a national scale, for example.
On the other hand, I personally believe that it is more necessary for all students showing their improvements in the learning process to receive incentives for their hard-work. First, because of being rewarded, students, regardless of their academic backgrounds, could have more motivation to study harder if their efforts are recognized. For example, teachers should pay a compliment for their students who progress in their studies to show their recognition for these students’ improvements, which could give rise to further betterment. By contrast, if only the best students receive rewards, other students might feel disappointed which would negatively affect their interest in studying.
In conclusion, although it is reasonable for students who are excellent in their academic learning I think that schools should give a chance for all students to be rewarded to facilitate students’ improvements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 61 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | yencmvbhp27@gmail.com | 92 | view |
| 2022-07-29 | ulzzang | view | |
| 2022-07-29 | ulzzang | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to encourage more local people to visit these places 78
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly by luck Do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives information about values NZ of the exports of kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 78
- In some countries the number of people choosing to live by themselves is increasing rapidly in recent years Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- The graph below shows information about the consumption of different types of fast food per person per week in England between 1980 and 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his would help these students to nurture and develop their academic skills and th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77913543211 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50625 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4912245267 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.307692308 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355825385454 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157537728877 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904228923697 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264730919511 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434153709333 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.