It is argued that pupils should be categorised in schools based upon their educational performance, while opponents assert that schools should not polarise students with different talents and academic abilities, while it is true that only academic performance group leads to the more study focussed environment; However I believe that all the skills should be taken into consideration, and no partiality leads to better exposure and comprehensive development.
On the one hand, the Number of parents considers bifurcation based on grades achieved at studies will ameliorate education, as it focusses a particular fraternity of students, whereas if every child is made to study jointly; will eventually disturb the overall performance of the class. for example, the orchid school in Poland make sections based upon the grades students secure, and they believe that this will improve the efficiency of top performers section, due to less commotion and similar fraternity. However, the other students who under-performs will continue with similar scores.
On the other hand, proponents of opposite notion believe that students from different abilities and talents should be made to study collaboratively without any differences. Because pupil is exposed to various traits and capabilities which are essential for their development. For instance, the survey conducted by the University of California in 2019 indicates that music helps children to evolve emotionally and playing sports aid in their physical development. Which is as crucial as their intelligence in academics. If they only focus on academics and made to sit with only over-achievers, then they miss-out other characteristics which are also essential.
In conclusion, although it is debatable that attention only towards studying and making batches of studious children will account for better scoring, but I believe that students are in a stage of learning all qualities rather than just academics. Therefore students should be thought that all humans are equal and should learn from each other, and work as a team.
- Some people believe that if people are allowed to work after the age of 60, it could cause problems. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Money can t buy happiness Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Some parents think its good to have their children mobile phones, others disagree?Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion. 78
- Some people are fond of buying new gadgets, phones, or laptops. Is this a good or bad thing? Discuss your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...b the overall performance of the class. for example, the orchid school in Poland ma...
^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orts aid in their physical development. Which is as crucial as their intelligence in ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...l qualities rather than just academics. Therefore students should be thought that all hum...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56289308176 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02468811331 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.452582284 49.4020404114 222% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.818181818 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9090909091 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273051000301 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974357471458 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731097092741 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16679025464 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057904129439 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 33.0 9.78957915832 337% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.