Some people think that some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy are too difficult for children to learn at school. They think that these subjects should be made optional rather than compulsory. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that children are facing too many problems related to choice of academic subjects. Some people concur that subjects like maths and philosophy should be optional in children's syllabus. However, I quibble from them and propound that maths should be compulsory in schooling subject, but philosophy should be elective. In this essay, I will cite light on some reasons who surround my opinion before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of mathematics which is essential in schools subjects. The top-notch concrete reason is that maths is basis of all other subjects such as physics, chemistry, account ect. Another rationale which hauls me to patron is that maths is helpful to children in term of analytical skills. Today, many Colleges and Universities in USA and Canada, require maths education till secondly school. In addition, number of multinational companies require analitical skill which is only have in children who have mathematics education. The rearmost coherent factor which cannot be neglected is that if maths as a part of compulsory subject, it opens oceans of opportunities in the future. Such as ones can be enrolled in engineering field, account and bank related field, medical ect. So, it is unquestionably to say that mathematics is very important as a compulsory subject.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that philosophy should be optional in schools which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that philosophy can be very difficult to understand for children in small age, because it consists social complexity and social relationships related chapters which is too tough. They also uphold that, this type of social subjects they can learn in college and university. Moreover, children also learn this social concept from teachers and parents by observing them. Hence, philosophy should be optional in schools.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting that maths should be compulsory and philosophy should be elective in schools. However, it contrary can be overlooked. Consequently, I partially agree with the given notion.
- Some people think that some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy are too difficult for children to learn at school They think that these subjects should be made optional rather than compulsory To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that travel is necessary to learn about other nations others however think that tv and internet is best way to learn discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Professionals like doctors teachers and lawyers contribute equally to society with non professionals including entertainers and sportspeople Thus they should receive equal pay Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples 84
- In some countries children have strict rules of behavior in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like To what extent should children have to follow rules 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 13.1623246493 205% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39275766017 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91383809311 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548746518106 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7623727595 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1904761905 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338894964377 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0977728010398 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727471822942 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204983658168 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070619510486 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.