Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources, while others think it is essential for mankind to continue to explore in which we live. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Reaching space was a dream which came true with the help of space technology. However, a group of individuals believes that it is an act of squandering whereas some consider that it is important to understand the universe. This essay will shed light on both views before making a final note.
Investing in space programs could not only be expensive but worthless. The amount of money being spent on space research is in the billions and the results are astonishingly minimal except for a bit improved technology which probably would have developed by other means. Such spending can elevate the financial burden on the nations which are already under the debt. Nevertheless, some other issues existing currently on the planet need immediate attention. These include the disappearance of rain forests, melting of glaciers and change in the surface temperature.
On the other hand, space mining can assist the inhabitants in advancing preparedness towards any catastrophe which may be threatening to the lives. To elaborate more, according to some researches, our planet had witnessed the impact of meteoroids and comets before human evolution. The disaster was so massive that it was able to eradicate life on the planet. To avoid such calamity in the future, humans need to carry on exploring the space which may lend hand to avert or mitigate the destruction.
In conclusion, scientific space research could be beneficial in disaster management; nonetheless, its results are intangible. In my opinion, some funds should be allocated for solving current environmental issues to avoid further depletion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | sameersomaya | 71 | view |
- Nowadays traffic is a serious problem in big cities Why this is so and what effects does it bring 90
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 67
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think spending on arts is a waste of money rather than a budget should be diverted to other public services. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think it is a positive or negative development 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, whereas, except for, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34117647059 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93212725546 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639215686275 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9447563659 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161932203517 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485463106263 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334438905147 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910898848397 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01140877119 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.