Whether spending a substantial amount of expenditure on celebrating a milestone should be deemed as a waste of monetary resources or an important objective has evolved as a contentious topic. Despite some argument expressing the financial waste in holding parties, I am more convinced that the positive implication of holding a party would be highly beneficial.
Those who place a great emphasis on monetary wastage in throwing a party point to the need for considering more pressing matters. Simply put, people can lay the groundwork for poverty-relief in their homeland or abroad, hopefully improving people's quality of life. This is proven that the less starvation and poverty, the more happiness and life satisfaction. A good illustration of this is clearly delineated by prospective couples who donate their the possible ritual costs for the good of people in need in order to eliminate their basic requirements. Furthermore, the issue of joblessness can be ameliorated by dedicating this money to entrepreneurs to set up their business, promoting job prospects for those suffering unemployment. This, in itself, play a key role in promoting social mobility, especially at the time of economic instability.
Turning to the opposite side of the argument, It seems likely that celebrating milestones go beyond material consideration, promoting individuals' spiritual enrichment. To put it differently, if one celebrates their wedding or birthday, meaning that they will show a tendency to share their happiness and milestone with their beloved people, yielding breaking the relationship's ice and bonding an emotional intimacy. In such occasions, the argument goes that individuals might win over their family and friends, especial at the face of dilemma and crisis. In addition to this, marking some special events are woven tightly into people's traditional custom, whereby allowing people to keep in touch with their identity and roots as we can see in India.
To conclude, While acknowledging the substantial role of neglecting from throwing a party to mark milestones in exchange for reducing poverty and unemployment rate, I would embrace that celebrations play a significant role in making strong relations aw as well as handing down the traditions passed through generation.
- The computer is widely used in education and some people think teachers do not play an important role in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 67
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive. What are your opinions on this? 56
- Some people believe that universities should only offer places to students with high marks, while other believes that people of all ages should be allowed even they don’t do well in school. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1941.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49858356941 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17106893039 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623229461756 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.316313239 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.307692308 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1538461538 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119321065816 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0392276215006 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384105479673 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0666683951501 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324770482271 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.