Compelling obvious evidence suggests that advanced computer technology has generally affected individuals working process and push them into their home. This interpretation can provide us with insight into the occurrence change in the people's lifestyle due to this new phenomenon. I assert that there are a multitude of positive and constructive development which will be elaborated in detail.
To begin with, no one can deny that advancement in computer technology has generally become a keystone of changing people's life and way of working in comparison with traditional custom. Simply put, most jobs and works are bound t manage by the computers after developing in wireless antenna. people tend to stay at home while they get occupied with administrative duties. As a result of this, they highly likely possess more time to spend with their family or friends. For instance, one engaged with the job from their home whereas he/she apportion a little time to outwork has more precious time available to cherish the family and friends or spend on the hobby. Such people, therefore, might benefit a close relationship between family members as well as a warmer family atmosphere.
In addition to the family perspective mentioned above, the economic advantages brought to those people should be taken into consideration as a positive development. To put it differently, inextricably intertwined with other aspects of life, it is believed that economic circumstance is a vital element in developing the quality of life. A person who is busy with distance-working can manage their budget facile and reduce some unnecessary expenses such as costs of the daily commute or extra expense on car maintenance. This new phenomenon stemmed from advancement in computer technology give rise a number of jobs gravitate toward to be more affordable, especially in low-income occupations.
To conclude, it is my firm conviction that advancement in computer technology has a far-reaching effect on both themes of family and economy in which one not only can dedicate more time to the family but also might create a barrier to waste their funds.
- Many elderly people are no long er looked after by their families but are put in care home or nursing home. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive. What are your opinions on this? 56
- In the past photography was used to real people and place however because of technology you can not trust what you see Is it a positive or negative development 64
- Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In many nations many people in huge cities either live alone or in small units instead of in large extended family groups Why is this Is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...sight into the occurrence change in the peoples lifestyle due to this new phenomenon. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 293, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...s after developing in wireless antenna. people tend to stay at home while they get occ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'apportions'.
Suggestion: apportions
... the job from their home whereas he/she apportion a little time to outwork has more preci...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29411764706 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02744653561 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3271554414 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187054634558 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650886849767 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505023298146 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116692783308 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372007291665 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.