Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
We see or hear the news related to road traffic accidents everyday. Though some people support the idea that harsh punishments for driving offences can play a prime role to decrease the traffic accidents, some including me, believe that improving road safety will be more helpful.
First of all, we need to understand the reasons behind the traffic accidents. According to one report I read, most of the accidents occured in my country is due to irresponsive driving or mistakes done by the drivers. Most of the drivers engaged in the accidents have driving license, legal documents of the vehicle and even wearing the seat belt at the time of the accidents. It clearly implies that if government imposes strict punishments or penalties for driving offences like drive without license & documents or driving after alcohol consumption will surely help to reduce few accidents, however the impact would not be so much.
On the other hand, government can improve the safety standards such as maintained roads, street lights, side roads, correct traffic signs, etc. This will be more useful to guide all the drivers. Most of the accidents happen during the night, therefore if we can add some extra safety measures like traffic lights, speed breakers, etc. then it will surely curb the large number of road accidents at night. Also, we have traffic & driving related rules with punishments and penalties that we must follow. Therefore, in my opinion, additional safety measures can actually reduce the traffic accidents.
In conclusion, I think focusing on the improvement of the road safety instead of increasing the penalty amounts or harshing existing punishments would be more effective suggestion.
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument Dr Benson is a renowned scientist known for his work in biochemistry and cardiology to est 53
- Passage Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of alt 93
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 wo 73
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms offices and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... news related to road traffic accidents everyday. Though some people support the idea th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22627737226 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6499951453 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576642335766 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.275906877 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.153846154 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363182748598 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115014131024 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0755928272827 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22597289827 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461200775284 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.