Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it. Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Certain people hold the belief that researching nutrients and cooking skill play a fundamental role for students, whilst some assert that students ought to concentrate on the core subjects. From my perspective, I opine that scholars need to learn the knowledge of food to lead a healthy lifestyle. This essay will discuss some reasons supporting my ideas.
On the one hand, the academic subjects are imperative for student development in their age. Those subjects provide the foundation knowledge for them to smoothly transit into a reputable tertiary education, and in the foremost future, they can have more job opportunities and pursue their dreams in the competitive world. That is the purpose of the school curriculum, the desire to make pupils become all-rounded, which means that they need to pay an absolute attention to gain knowledge to meet the demand. This, however, might lead to a high pressure on them; they would cope with mental issues, which are to blame for a decrease in academic performance.
On the other hand, researching nourishment on a daily basis would help school children have the insightful knowledge to be more accountable for their wellness. In effect, they need to be healthy in order to carry on their studies. To ensure their well-being, they are obligated to familiarise themselves with the food and its nutritions so that they could form a reasonable eating habit to improve their immune system against diseases. They also know how to cook as some ingredients might do harm for them if it is used improperly. For instance, if the sprouted potatoes will cause food poisoning if they are cooked. In addition, doing prep cook is helpful for children to fend for themselves, and they are confident to live apart from their family.
In brief, it is debatable to advocate prioritising whether the compulsory subjects in education or food science. Both are really worthy for intellectual and social life development, but I firmly take the position that it is essential for school children to be full of insight into food to have a wholesome living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | kphuong1901 | 78 | view |
- If old people are no longer physically mentally or financially able to look after themselves younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world today In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is replacing fossil fuels Is this a positive or negative development 67
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In some countries most people prefer to rent their homes rather than buy them What are some advantages and disadvantages of renting a home 89
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on other important subjects Discuss in both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, well, apart from, for instance, in addition, in brief, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08139534884 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81275200181 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5849154543 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.533333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114596156352 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439575323104 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0271474852149 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782048210729 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271382415762 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.