Some people think technology development decreases crime, while others believe it actually encourages crime. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some individuals believe that cutting-edge technology cultivates more crime cases, others feel that it is useful for reducing crime. There are disputes on both arguments which I will explicate in the ensuing paragraph.
To start with, supporters of enhancing crime by advanced technology declare that this might risk people’s privacy since today, many identities or privacy things have spread out on the internet that are hacked from their phone or computer. Thus, this would harm people because of the misuse or sale of private identity by hackers. Moreover, the misuses of technology might lose individuals funds because of scamming or carding. This can be seen in dark markets, such as the deep web, where many scammers sell credit cards freely. As a result, this might make people aware of purchasing items in public markets and feel unsafe when they want to buy with credit cards.
Another point worth considering is that many people feel that the development of technology may lead authorities to be easy to find or suspect the criminals, such as the existence of surveillance cameras by seeing the footage of crime cases. Thus, this would make the criminals think twice when they want to do crime and would make the environmental surroundings safe. In addition, this might help the cops to detect illegal items in airports or harbors which are hard to see without assistance. This is based on many crimes, such as selling drugs or guns desiring to export these items. For instance, airport X-ray machines, detecting illegal goods and making the criminal case go down.
Overall, we have to emphasize that the advanced technology would contribute significant benefits such as helping authorities to find criminals and the evidence of crimes. This is as long as this can be used for scamming to get more money.
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians Others believe that artists should be funded by alternative sources Discuss both views and give your own 62
- Some people believe that when designing a building the most important thing to be considered is the function rather than the outward appearance To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In modern times some species of animals are slowly disappearing Do you think that it is acceptable for species to become extinct What are the possible reasons of this extinction 84
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays both men and women spend much money on beauty care This was not so in the past What may be the root cause of this behaviour Discuss the reasons and possible results 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08637873754 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61312101758 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591362126246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2439333457 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157373410914 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523149229042 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740255395211 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111946051128 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900011893733 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.