It is often argued that universities should be practical for pupils to suit themselves on the working environment whereas others believe that the true significance should afford a deep knowledge basis for graduates. In my view, universities may maintain both knowledge between practical and academic.
To begin with, a purely academic learning environment is possible to damage the future of graduates. While the academic level must be certainly higher than learning in a practical environment, these species of student may not adapt to a new atmosphere in the future as soon as they are graduated. For instance, the known example was a Hong Kong master who cannot found the favored work since his interview performance was poor as a kid. Finally, he was being unemployed from his self-respect. Since they will tend to apply high-level job opportunities by their high academic qualification, universities should prepare a part of course or even create an internship to strengthen their working performance.
On the other hand, practical learning is available to prompt a total development for the graduates. As far as the atmosphere of universities is same as a workplace, such as provide a competitive campus, graduates would absorb the working environment early as well as understand that what they lack to their work requirement at the moment. So, graduates are able to pursue a full self-learning, to fulfill the acquirement of their dream during their studying period.
In conclusion, because of the purpose of providing a practical campus is let graduates know their work prospection as well as it will not hurt the knowledge of academic level seriously, I strongly believe that the advantages of establishing a practical environment of universities absolutely outweigh the disadvantages.
- THE CHART BELOWSHOWS THE PERCENTGE OF HOUSEHOLDS IN OWNED AND RENTED ACCOMODATION IN ENGLAND AND WALES BETWEEN 1918 AND 2011. 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 56
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, may, so, then, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37455830389 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23670282498 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572438162544 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2143562538 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.272727273 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0909090909 7.06120827912 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188484897963 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695319977054 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638922606211 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127386044925 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720333666788 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.