Some people think that we should divide students based on their academic ability, while others think we should educate all students together. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Education Is always an essential part of society, contributing a huge benefit to the development of a country. Therefore, people pay a lot of attention to educational matters. This leads to arise two opinions some people support dividing students based on their academic ability, while others oppose educating all students together. From my perspective, there are more significant benefits when students have a chance to study together.
To commence with the first notion, they are some reasons to explain why people support the first way. Dividing students into suitable classes depending on academic knowledge basement will properly assess their ability of them. From that, teachers may find the right methods for their students, and advance the effectiveness of the study. The second reason lies in motivating students in order to improve their studies progress. It is inevitable that if students have a desire to gain a seat in a higher class, they will try their best to improve their scores with the opening spirit of learning. For instance, in Vietnam, it is quite easy to find a school that has an entrance exam to split students based on their current ability. The final result is that a number of students show remarkable improvement in their studies.
However, we also have to consider the side adverse of this thought. Classification of students might create a negative atmosphere in schools, which again has an unexpected impact on the growth of children. This also brings students feelings of discrimination, but if all students are coming together, they can learn a great amount of valuable knowledge that they can’t experience anywhere. Different people will have distinctive mindsets and skills. These are vital to be successful such as they can share with students of various thoughts, ideas, religions, and so on, which students can never get from any book. In addition, it will help students learn how to harmony with different people. furthermore, various skills from students can create a fruitful diversity, which directly or indirectly disseminates positive ideas.
In conclusion, although there are some beneficial things to divide students based on their level. I believe that students will be grown comprehensively if they are learned in a collaborative environment.
- Topic The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 The second graph shows the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so medical services should not be run by profit making companies Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fr 89
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...n how to harmony with different people. furthermore, various skills from students can creat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32602739726 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87737239655 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578082191781 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8443323942 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287895275522 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892933314865 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770759944034 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188784403564 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050062688469 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.