Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
What should be criteria for considering any candidate to be fit for any job or task? Should innovative skill be made main criteria for selection or team work? These questions are subject of moot. Most experts believe that, in today’s advancements in science and technology, ability to invent new discoveries should be made obligatory and most important criteria for any vacant post. However, I refrain to support this too extreme argument and, instead, contend that best criteria for choosing any candidate is contingent upon the field company is related rather than categorically deciding aforementioned criteria to be “best” for the company.
In most cases and types of company we are dealing with, the best way of recruiting employee will be to prioritize team work skills and obedience as a major criteria of the candidates. It includes professional fields such as management, engineering, medical science and infrastructure projects where one’s task cannot be completed with help of other and, is contingent upon progress of others within same department. In other words, their tasks are intertwined and each department within a company overlap and depends upon other to achieve overall objectives. Let us take example of a hydropower company where there are different departments: Civil Engineering department, mechanical department, electrical department and admin department. The task carried out by a civil engineer working on power house design must rely on work of mechanical engineer as his task can only be completed after completion of hydromechanical design. This is not limited to Civil engineering field. In infrastructure projects, construction workers depend upon electrician for lightning, labour who place concrete upon a mechanic for welding steel during construction and construction manager upon site engineer to produce contractor bill. So, a person who work autonomously without requiring help from other can actually become headwind for overall objectives and progress of any institution. So, in these cases, it is better to choose the candidate who can work in unanimous working environment rather than those who work individually.
However, in some cases, innovative and individual skill outweigh obedience and team work. In these type of fields, the work of one employee does not overlap with other. These types of field are research and development, software development field and education. For instance, let us consider teaching field. A science teacher do not require assistance of others to teach his material. Similarly, in research field, it requires individual to discover new findings. Furthermore, in software development field, there are separate departments working individually like web development area do not interfere with android developers. In holistic sense, these fields may require team work within their own department but in most of the cases task can be easily achieved working without help of others.
In conclusion, the subject matter is moot and there are no easy answers. While most of experts in this matter endorse innovation and independent as major prerequisites to choose any candidate, I, however, contend that, in most of the cases, team work skill and obedience outweigh by far more than those supported by many as most of the field known to mankind requires each other to work in a team to achieve any task given. I also contend that there are some fields where innovation skill should be made prime consideration while selecting any employee. In other words, it depends upon type of company the context is related.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | jany01 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | gwyneth+12 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | stsoutsold | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | moctutuyen | 84 | view |
- With development of media online there is no future for radio 89
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 84
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.Discuss both views 61
- With development of media online, there is no future for radio. 73
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.Discuss both views 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...am work skills and obedience as a major criteria of the candidates. It includes professi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 80, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the experts') or simply say ''most experts''.
Suggestion: most of the experts; most experts
...ot and there are no easy answers. While most of experts in this matter endorse innovation and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 627, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...type of company the context is related.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, similarly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in most cases, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 41.998997996 190% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 8.3376753507 384% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3060.0 1615.20841683 189% => OK
No of words: 561.0 315.596192385 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86676880123 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02820835646 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477718360071 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 968.4 506.74238477 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.76152304609 273% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4396346896 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.692307692 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5769230769 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180025952893 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569401238621 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049869977904 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117528434559 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313223578995 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.