Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets, however, others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on the earth that government should be solving =. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In the prevalence of profound problematic circumstances that are demanding solutions from government, sometimes people are resistant to accept that a nation should be spending more on a phenomenon that hardly seems possible such as, investigation of survival chances on other planets. In my opinion, as much as solving prevalent difficulty is important, setting a long-term alternative for problems created by human beings, by exploring the opportunities to be able to have access to another planet in the future is also important.
The planet earth has been a habitat of the human being from a long time. People tend to forget that they are more or less creating problems in the surroundings they live in course of their living. While it is unanimously agreed by everyone that the government should actively take part in resolving the problems on the earth, they do not spare a minute to think that to some extent amendments to various factor such as, cutting down of more trees to build more number of houses for growing population cannot be stopped. Thus, despite being a reasonable expectation of people, different and varied implementation from the government might not be enough to solve the existing problem.
A long-term alternative should be thought for the future when the earth will not be able to accommodate the increasing necessity of growing population anymore. Only if expenses are made on exploring life on other planets, people could develop hope of a future for the future generation. People oppose to this by saying it is near to impossible. However, the fact that people thought it would not be impossible to connect to people in any corner of the world a century ago can be used as an illustration of time can change and impossible can be made possible through constant effort and allocation of necessary time, resources and money.
To conclude, attempts of solving existing problems are wise but it should not stop experiments and explorations from happenng to create a new world in an entirely new planet which could be a huge achievement to mankind.
- The claim that animals have rights has been subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals?should be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some countries encourage teenagers to have a part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views. 78
- Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on the earth that government should be solving Discuss both sides and give your opinion 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, such as, in my opinion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04057971014 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90026905588 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544927536232 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.4998925141 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.090909091 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3636363636 20.7667163134 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284362454861 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982246151118 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405489320148 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151747468595 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542903438369 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.