Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets, however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this industrialized era, there are those who hold the belief that the expenditure of the searches for other lives in space is a wastage. Meanwhile, the others agree that the government should spend the public budget on immediate solutions for global problems.
On the one hand, it is believed that the governments should make moves toward resolving these drawbacks as soon as possible. In clarification, climate change is becoming an alarming global issue. As a result, it is obvious that the fauna of the Earth is gradually lose their accommodation and this leads to the serious ecology imbalance. For example, the calving of the icebergs and glaciers in both Arctic and Antarctic is determined as the main cause of the death of many polar bears. Thus, the administration should take action to help the animals in saving their shelters. Moreover there are still varied people having to suffer from diseases, poverty and natural disasters. Therefore, it is necessary for the governments to spend more money on medical treatment, food supply, better education and more job opportunities.
In parallel, the alien projects should also be conducted as a long-term solution for the global demands. In detail, it can be seen that the depletion of natural fossil fuel is considered to be an urgent question. For instance, the oil is predicted to be run out in the near future. As a result, the adverse effect of oil depletion will include the degradation of transport sector, the barriers in manufacture and so on. Hence, finding out new lives may be a new hope for us to handle this obstacle.
To conclude, it is undeniable that the governments should highly focus on dealing with these recent global disadvantages. However, the long-term strategy for the human desire also needs to be concerned by exploring an replaced provision in other planets. In my perspective, I strongly advocate the balance of the finance distribution in both these fields.
- Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.What are the reasons for this?Does it have a good or a bad effect on children 61
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines. Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children? 78
- Some people believe that men and women are equal and so women should be able to do any job they want Others feel that men and women are not equal and therefore there are certain jobs which are not suitable for women What is your opinion 73
- Nowadays children play less with others and this has an impact on their development What are the reasons for this Does it have a good or a bad effect on children 90
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think it should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'lost'.
Suggestion: lost
...hat the fauna of the Earth is gradually lose their accommodation and this leads to t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...p the animals in saving their shelters. Moreover there are still varied people having to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...also needs to be concerned by exploring an replaced provision in other planets. In...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08074534161 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9040306082 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5295473024 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.2352941176 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257061045677 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673897274751 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568629543768 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146090615204 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037755155903 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.