Some people work for the same organisations all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Nowadays, unemployment is improving because all of the world is struggling with position of pandemic. Lots of job scats were shortened. It is often argued that a number of people work for the same company all their whole life, whereas others comprehend that it is useful to work for various organizations. This essay will discuss both points of view and why I disagree that some people carry on the same business all their whole life.
Job is one of the basic human needs that should be satisfied. Lots of people work for the constant profession their entire life. It may be important for them but others presume it is unsatisfactory and uninteresting. As long as working for same organisations is boring. People who work in the same place for the rest of their lives can neither be proactive nor meet other new staff.
There is another side to the issue. All people, however, presume with the first view is beneficial. Working for different company is important for employers. They will get acquainted to new friends. If one of the employers is appointed a new job to other company, it is favourable for them to earn much money for life expectancy. If the salary of the new job is better than the previous one, the worker can evaluate his new business and change his permanent lifestyle.
To sum up, taking all of the above into account, a person' s approach to his profession and responsibility will increase if he works in the workplace of his choice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | preetsidhu29500@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | kavi jk | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | Ja Han | 56 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | nishchayvaid93 | 87 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tanmeet | 56 | view |
- The first pie chart illustrates the rate of energy consumptions in households the latter one provides information concerning gas emissions brought about energy usage in Australia 84
- In the future nobody will purchase published papers or books since they will be able to read them virtually and free 61
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 84
- The figures illustrate the statistics about usage of water in Oceania in the year of 2004 100
- The bar chart illustrates the statistics about households in owned and rented accommodation in UK from 1918 to 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...days, unemployment is improving because all of the world is struggling with position of pa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he same business all their whole life. Job is one of the basic human needs that...
^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anisations is boring. People who work in the same place for the rest of their li...
^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tions is boring. People who work in the same place for the rest of their lives c...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e proactive nor meet other new staff. There is another side to the issue. All ...
^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the employers is appointed a new job to other company, it is favourable for them...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and change his permanent lifestyle. To sum up, taking all of the above into ...
^^^
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...anent lifestyle. To sum up, taking all of the above into account, a person s approach...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, whereas, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7137254902 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73433182876 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1288950122 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.125 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512275910284 0.244688304435 209% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159851874125 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167676365974 0.0667982634062 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286020078494 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138392440307 0.056905535591 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.