There has been a remarkable increase in the number of psychologists who believe that people ought to do nothing at all for a break time of the day in order to cope with stress. This essay will delve both sides of this view before drawing a reasonable conclusion. I definitely disagree with this idea because to do nothing might increase stress level due to feelings of asocialisation, alienation, and even depression.
Admittedly, the negative implications of to do nothing are often discussed in terms of two key areas, which are creativity and productivity. Perhaps the main drawbacks of this advice is that employees’ creativity decrease, which in turn leads to mental problems, such as depression. According to a report published by the New York Times, creative works are the quickest way to get rid of negative energy and workplace stress in the Apple Company. Secondly, to do nothing at all for a period time affects not only creativity but also productivity. A good illustration of this is that workers who spend more time on resting are more predisposed to be less productive. Hence, both people and employers ought to be prudent because to spend a lot of time on break might increase stress level rather than decrease.
Despite these arguments, the benefits of to do nothing at all for a period of time of the day should not be underestimated. The primary advantage of this is that there is a pronounced correlation between the amount of happiness hormones and break time. Therefore, when people give a break, their brains release either melatonin or serotonin. For instance, people who suffer from work stress could easily cope with negative energy through these hormones in a national bank. Thus, working without any break time might be perilous for people’s mental health.
In conclusion, the decision as to whether which method is more useful in order to overcome stress must be taken in the context of entire psychologists. However, my personal view is that waiting without do anything can lead some psychological problems.
- Some people say modern children's games do not develop a wide range of skills, while traditional games can be much better for developing such skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- some people think that competitive sports should be included as a subject inschool while others believe that it has negative effect on children.Discuss both the view and give your opinion. 73
- Grandparents play a big role in bringing up the children. Do you think it is useful for grandparents? Discuss reasons with your opinion and give relevant examples. 73
- The number of older people is increasing. Some people think it will cause the problem to their countries, others believe this group is important to society. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... benefits of to do nothing at all for a period of time of the day should not be underestimated...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lous for people's mental health. In conclusion, the decision as to whethe...
^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ealth. In conclusion, the decision as to whether which method is more useful in order to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08259587021 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96620247662 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548672566372 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7448615738 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.6875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141042731965 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476320057385 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0418123055393 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948856192249 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323191136303 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.