Some studies suggest criminals have a low level of education. For this reason, the best way to reduce crime levels is to educate people in prisons so that they can get a job after they are released from prisons. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is true that the majority of criminals are people receiving little to no education. This leads to the discussion saying that equipping prisoners with proper education to help them find a job after being discharged is the ultimate solution. However, I am against this statement because the better way to tackle this issue would be educating possible criminals in advanced and establish serious punishments for offenders.
Some people argue that if criminals are provided chances to obtain knowledge in jails, they could be employed after getting out of it, thus lowering crime rates. This is partly sound because this solution could only reduce the rates of ex-criminals recommitting crimes. To solve the problem constructively, governments should make investment in education system in underdeveloped regions, where there are high level of crimes. When people in these areas are substantially equipped with certain knowledge and skills, they could make a living on their own hard work, instead of committing illegal acts. To further foster this, it is also crucial that investments in infrastructure are made so that companies are encouraged to move out of metropolitans.
Another possible solution would be for authority to pose stricter penalties for wrongdoings. For example, in North Korea, people who illegally import foreign cultural publications into the country will receive death sentence. There have been several cases like this in North Korea, those who are intending to commit this would look at the previous cases as a lesson and thus be discouraged to offend the same crime. Ever since introducing this punishment, the number of cases trying to import foreign culture has considerably fallen.
In conclusion, educating prisoners is not the best way in the attempt of lowering crime levels. More feasible strategies would be providing employment job opportunities for potential criminals and raising levels of punishments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-25 | Trang Duong | 84 | view |
- Pebbleton Village 20 years ago vs now 73
- Percentage of people occupation in UK and Ashby
- Two road tunnels in an Australia city 84
- UK and Ashby percentages of occupation
- We are now living in a throwaway culture using things for a short time and then throwing them away instead of fixing What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47176079734 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94346159842 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63122923588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6440293631 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.642857143 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291933127442 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092158354738 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558877076132 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176695415583 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606722176607 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.