Some think dangerous extreme sports such as skydiving and rock climbing should be banned. To what extent do you agree?
The adventurous sports, including skydiving and rock climbing, are suggested to be banned by several people. Partially, I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points, which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph.
On the one hand, it is contended that forbidding extreme sports mean decreasing physical activities, such as building muscles mass, endurance and strength. Along with this, overcoming fear and getting rid of monotonous life helps people to release frustration and bad emotions. Many athlete experts claim that adrenaline flow stimulates dopamine and endorphins releases, expressing a real sense of excitement. Furthermore, the suppliers of such sports will be insolvent since the high-priced equipment in assets. Probably, this business included in category of “High-risk high-return investment”, where the regulation would endanger the existence of the companies, going bankruptcy.
On the other hand, we should value more the benefits that the policy may hinder players from long-life disabilities. For instance, spinal injuries and permanent brain damage become their great risks, even using safety equipment. Cited by some journals, the number of serious accidents has increased for recent decades, as Base jumping reaching nearly half of all deaths in Red Bull events. In addition, psychiatric impairments of viewers can be provoked by regularly watching such sports. Witnessing the accidental deaths filmed in front of eyes will affect mental balance or commonly called “Victarius Trauma”, this is proven that the people can still be psychologically affected by what they have seen or heard.
Overall, it seems to me that planning to veto hazardous extreme activities, including to enhance athletes’ safety from fatal injuries and mental stability of viewers. This is as long as the individuals still keep regular exercising for better body health.
- Recreational drugs should be legalised and there should be no punishments for people who use them To what extent do you agree 89
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 89
- Nowadays employment options are changing and employees cannot rely on having v the same job 1 and working v conditions 2 throughout their life What are some possible causes Suggest some ways to plan for the future under these circumstances 80
- Nowadays most children prefer to spend several hours playing with electronic devices over doing more traditional leisure activities What problem does this cause What do you think are possible solutions 80
- Some people think we do not need museums any more in the modern world Do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, still, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73144876325 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00684498397 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713780918728 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8087306635 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14507433937 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437445438239 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529484486279 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764842493505 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330131504436 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.