Some travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development
Since the first satellite was launched in 1957 by the Soviet Union, many individuals have strongly dreamt that space tourism could be available for all people in the future. In my own opinion, I firmly believe this trend has both disadvantages and advantages.
On the one hand, there are several significant benefits of space tourism that can not be denied. The most pivotal advantage is that through travelling the space, people could discover more knowledge about the universe. In other words, space tourism would give travellers opportunities to experience living in outer space and eventually enrich their knowledge about the Milky Way galaxy or the Solar System. In addition, thanks to space trips, the government could have more money for other purposes such as in education or national health services because through these trips, space tourism companies such as SpaceX could gain more profits, hence they would contribute a large number of taxes on the national budget.
On the other hand, in reality, space tourism can risk a number of drawbacks that are definite. Firstly, space trips could have a negative impact on the Earth’s environment because in order to produce and operate equipment for these tours, especially spacecraft, a large amount of fuel has to be used which could partly lead to environmental issues such as climate change. Moreover, travellers might suffer from several dangerous and even deadly situations such as dropping spaceships, which not only kill all passengers but also make a disaster for the Earth because a falling spacecraft is similar to a meteoroid.
To sum up, although space trips would become extremely popular in the near future, many individuals still suspect this development. I am of the opinion that space travel has several downsides, but they could be outweighed by advantages as I mentioned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-10 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | nhung3012 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-08 | Albert Armin | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-06 | Nguyenkhanh7705 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000 67
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people claim that not enough of waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...re profits, hence they would contribute a large number of taxes on the national budget. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...weighed by advantages as I mentioned.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, still, as to, in addition, such as, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24832214765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70514759698 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.6845708561 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.181818182 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196493289991 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809438232436 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365034491034 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120723630801 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226949426278 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.