The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems on our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Nowadays, the question “whether spending a huge amount of money for space traveling is a reasonable decision or not?” has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world. I tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common view that exploring in the space plays a vital role not only in each society but also in the world. To put into consideration, I express why I support this subject. First and foremost is that a wide variety of scarce and hidden mysterious will be unfolded by the Scientists. Secondly, it can be argued that since the population of the Earth is being increased and it is becoming lesser so that we have to discover the galaxy to find the other planets that are appropriate for a living. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that we can contact with other extraterrestrial species. A group of scientists, working at prestigious university conducted that it may possible, other organisms that have been living in other planets know more about technology and medicine. For example, about the treatment of AIDS that we do not know presently.
However, there is no doubt that spending a large amount of budget for space traveling provides some negative points. It should be taken into account that the majority of the third nations are suffering from famine, starvation, and malnutrition, so the government should support them instead of spending money on space exploration. Moreover, pollution crisis is the other problem that must be considered by the government. For instance, investing in producing eco-friendly fuels.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree with spending money on traveling space. However, every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and the individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 80
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing, skydiving, bungee jumping or not? What are the reasons for that? 88
- What is your idea of Involvement_of_employees_in_decision_making process in the company? 77
- In Some Countries round the world, Voting Is Compulsory. Do You Agree With The Notion Of Compulsory Voting? 80
- In Some Countries round the world, Voting Is Compulsory. Do You Agree With The Notion Of Compulsory Voting? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nable decision or not?' has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other planets that are appropriate for a living. In addition to this information,...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing in producing eco-friendly fuels. To recapitulate, I entirely agree with s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10932475884 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97494560998 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581993569132 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7740408912 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.933333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193760109284 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060153518138 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539510763199 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111158524519 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385599330394 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.