Owing to innovations in technology as well as chemistry many advancements have resulted in agriculture. However, some people are reeling under hunger. There are various reasons behind this. This essay intends to discuss causes and provide empirical solutions for this impede.
To begin with, there are plethora reasons because of which people suffer malnutrition. First is geography of the area. To enumerate, there are many isolated or remote control areas across world where agriculture is not possible because of extreme weather conditions. Moreover, the hilly areas are an obstacle in the way to access to markets of cities. Furthermore, in this world of some people are not sufficient money to manage for food.
However, as every lock has a key, this problem has also solutions. Government needs to take some steps. First to do is to provide good transportation facilities to residents of remote areas to access to cities markets for food. Second is to provide special facilities to poor for food. For instance, Punjab government provided blue cards to poors by which they can buy limited amount of food from government food stores.
To recapitulate, although many improvements have taken place in agriculture. But, minority of people are dealing with hunger because of environmental and transport services. Government can take appropriate steps to minimize this problem.
- In spite of the advance made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 56
- Nowadays some buildings such as offices and schools have open space design instead of separate rooms Why is it so Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o provide special facilities to poor for food. For instance, Punjab government pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, well, as to, for instance, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 217.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38709677419 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87216949351 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599078341014 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5849435585 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.7647058824 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.7647058824 20.7667163134 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198762169269 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647150082892 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591575121321 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135024227666 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611226913539 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.09 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.