In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Despite the fact that in agriculture some advancement or breakthrough have been launched and implemented, the world still witnesses plenty of human beings in poverty or under malnourished condition. This essay will emphasize some reasons behind this contradict event and also suggest several solutions which my modify the reality.
To begin with, this serious problem has existed for some reasons in line with financial issues and other noticeable forces. In fact, those types of development have been invented and invested in order to stimulate the agriculture in developed countries while many developing countries whose major economy is agriculture cannot afford most of modern technologies. They still use mainly outdated methods in farming, resulting in poor crops with bring them a modest amount of produce or income which they have to manage to live on. Additionally, many regions must face other issues such as war and conflicts, climate crisis or poor natural resources preventing them from improving, making income or escaping from hunger. For example, a considerable number of nations in Africa have suffered from malnourished conditions because of their unpleasant weather which appears to bar them from doing farming properly or having productive crops.
As a result, it is essential to alleviate the problem with possible solutions. In order to support poor people, it is believed that wealthy individuals or residents from industrial countries should join hand, raise fund, and allocate the budget and resources to places in need. Moreover, every individual should be educated about climate change, environment, war and conflicts, so that they can be aware of the importance of having a better planet. In other words when humans live in positivity and security, they can focus on working and making money. Thus, they can possess advances themselves in improving productivity in farming without waiting for donation or allotment from others.
In conclusion, it is significant to identify the causes of hunger despite the improvement of technology and industry in agriculture. Consequently, several resolutions would be introduced effectively to address the current situation.
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers any more To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- NOWADAYS FOOTBALL SUPPORTERS BEHAVE VIOLENTLY WHAT IS THE CAUSE AND HOW DO WE SOLVE IT 11
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 84
- Organized tours to remote community and other countries are increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for local people and the local environment 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advancement seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much advancement', 'a good deal of advancement'.
Suggestion: much advancement; a good deal of advancement
Despite the fact that in agriculture many advancement and breakthrough have been launched and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...having a better planet. In other words. when humans live in positivity and security,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54029850746 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91248455328 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623880597015 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0778831253 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.571428571 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161423626683 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487735529912 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472923053096 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980102753171 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647249555292 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.