Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Concerns have been raised on whether giving a speech could gain better approach the ultimate errand of conversation than writing or not. This essay would contend that though illustrating thoughts through writing may provide readers with completed-checking stories, it is speaking to others that convey the whole meaning effectively.
On the one hand, having well-written lectures could associate human with diverse benefits in communicating. With regards to the amount of time taken to inspire explicit meanings to readers, most writers can make use of motivating language boost more sympathy from others when the final work can be comprehended in a cohesive way. This leads to a prevalent belief that if people can translate their perspective by writing, effective communication is more likely to be practical.
On the other hand, the power of voice is much persuasive rather than writing. While having chances to communicate about one theme, people could discuss interactively with the main speaker, which contributes to the quality of the speech. What makes spoken translation outstanding and be used widely is that it permits everyone to participate in the story by giving questions and letting their voice heard. Furthermore, body language is commonly acknowledged to be a vital skill to better interpret people. As for interpersonal skills put into practice, people have gained inspirational conversation.
In conclusion, although writing can exchange ideas cohesively, spoken language is said to take over the precedence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-30 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife animals while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 11
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a cohesive way" with adverb for "cohesive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...when the final work can be comprehended in a cohesive way. This leads to a prevalent belief that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, as for, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5811965812 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09285996212 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.679487179487 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.874215411 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.727272727 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122760401516 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428055708376 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363151364229 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063354494252 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351287967964 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.