These days, with the mass amount of data available on the internet, some people argue the necessity of libraries. It is true that the roles of libraries have diminished in the academic field of students, but this does not eliminate the students' requirements for libraries.
I agree that nowadays students mostly browse in the internet for their school projects and less refer to libraries. This is because they can gain a large quantity of information in every subject much easier and faster. Also they can organize and collate this acquired data more conveniently in comparison with reading several books and taking notes. Therefore students are more dependent on online resources and computers than libraries and books.
However, it can not detract from value of libraries due to various reasons. Firstly, students might be interested in some fields other than their academic subjects, such as story books, poetry and so on. It will be hard for them to read such stuffs on the internet. In fact gazing for a long period of time at the screens of mobiles or tablets can be really annoying and may result in making them have poor eyesight. Secondly, there are some special materials for example reference books or some old but valuable resources which cannot be found on the internet. Finally, the favorable ambience of libraries and watching other students while they are reading, encourages students to read more. Thus, libraries still have many functions.
In conclusion, although the function of libraries are affected with easy access to online resources of information, I would argue that they are still essential for students, for instance for extra reading beyond school lessons, some rare and valuable resources and using the library space for reading besides other classmates.
- Nowadays many children have trouble paying attention in class or concentrating on their school work Why is this happening How can this problem be solved 73
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 84
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 67
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... every subject much easier and faster. Also they can organize and collate this acqu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...reading several books and taking notes. Therefore students are more dependent on online r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...the internet. In fact gazing for a long period of time at the screens of mobiles or tablets ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, however, may, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19310344828 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58731930099 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.1111916748 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.571428571 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5714285714 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154525923619 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576560491548 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399795531622 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0938975179723 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374602096238 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.