Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people think that there are more merits studying face-to-face than online education. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement.
There are several benefits for studying in a physical classroom compares to digital one. Firstly, students will be able to build long-lasting relationships. Many students are put in a classroom, and are forced to interact with each other. This is because teachers want them to get along and help their peers when they having trouble in class. Thus, pupils will be able to build a circle of friends and improve their social life. For instance, students who have a hard time understanding a particular lecture, their teacher can tell the classmate next to them to help them out.
In addition, undergrads mental health. Going to class every day and interacting with people their age will significantly boost their mood. Moreover, their performance will improve once their mental state is in good condition. This can help students to work and study more efficiently. Hence, improving their grades. For example, there are studies and research proves that studying in a classroom improve students cognitive ability and their mental health compares to the digital group where the pupils performance decreased, and show sign of depression and anxiety.
In conclusion, students will perform better if they study in school rather than e-learning. I completely agree that we should let students study in a classroom since it can help them build their relationships, and also improving their mood and ability to perform well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area in Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 67
- At present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of old people Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce will improve once their mental state is in good condition. This can help stud...
^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...compares to the digital group where the pupils performance decreased, and show sign of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.284 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75536131932 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9148785787 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18136590515 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674580939463 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583891725127 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134542649509 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391367861466 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce will improve once their mental state is in good condition. This can help stud...
^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'pupils'' or 'pupil's'?
Suggestion: pupils'; pupil's
...compares to the digital group where the pupils performance decreased, and show sign of...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.284 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75536131932 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9148785787 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5625 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18136590515 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674580939463 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583891725127 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134542649509 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391367861466 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.