• Task 2: Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods, while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that manufacturers and supermarkets should be under obligation to minimise the amount of packaging of goods whereas some argue that customers should take care to buy goods with packaging as little as possible. In my opinion, I am neutral with this argument because each person and business should be responsible for that.
On the one hand, producers and supermarkets must reduce the amount of packaging for some reasons. First, if they implement plans in order to cut down packaging, we will witness a dramatic fall in the amount of packaging all over the world. To be more specific, there are millions of packages utilised in a factory or supermarket so it is very crucial to eliminate this massive source of packaging. The second one is that manufacturers and supermarket owners are able to trigger the amount of packaging decline in a more reasonable way. They can more easily invent an alternative method to secure intact goods for customers instead of wrapping them by packages as there are a lot of scientists and environment consultants who work in businesses.
On the other hand, each buyer should avoid merchandise accompanied with a lot of packaging. First, thanks to the tendency of using goods with the least amount of packaging, customers spread the message ‘no packaging’ to others. Hence, they will be models for people to follow and the awareness of the public will rise in the long run, the important key to solving this problem. Second, people are inclined to use less packaging, which has a great impact on factories. Therefore, companies will redesign their products so that people do not need to use packaging to deliver.
In conclusion, both manufacturers, supermarkets and customers should make efforts to reduce the amount of packaging.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | duykhanh3204 | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | minh phương phạm hồng | 71 | view |
- Task 1 The plan below shows a school in 1985 and the school now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- Task 1 The charts below show the percentages of men and women aged 60 64 in employment in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 2 Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have much higher salaries than other workers in a company To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Task 1 The plans below show how the ground of a particular building has changed over time Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 11
- Task 2 People who decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it are more likely to have a satisfying working life than those who change jobs frequently To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orts to reduce the amount of packaging.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07823129252 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90344925653 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4900455295 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.396108253135 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139077809157 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106937217917 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252435554081 0.151304729494 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750074344915 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.